|
|
Executive & Master
Business
Coach | |
Executive: (Un)Awareness
Inventory
"Outstanding leaders, executives and
managers distinguish themselves by their ability to
understand and manage themselves and to understand and
work with others."
Richard
Boyatzis, Case Western University on Emotional
Intelligence |
Here's who I
am, it's what has me...and where my journey lies!
What has you? |
Representational
Styles: In order of preference:
Auditory,
Visual, Kinesthetic, Auditory
Digital |
Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode
Instrument: [view
report]
90%.
ACCOMMODATING 5%.
AVOIDING
30%.
COLLABORATING 18%.
COMPROMISING 32%. |
Learning Styles Inventory:
[view
chart]
Converging
|
Personal Interests, Attitudes &
Values: [view
report]
1998
Theoretical/Utilitarian 2002
Theoretical/Utilitarian
1998
Individualistic/Aesthetic 2002
Individualistic/Traditional
1998
Social/Traditional
2002
Social/Aesthetic |
DISC [view
report]
Natural: D = 97%
I = 80% S = 12% C
= 1%
Adapted: D = 100%
I = 63% S = 23% C
= 39%
|
BASIC NATURAL SELF
Trait Pairs
LOGIC:
Feeling
ENERGY:
Thrust/High Achiever
SATISFACTION:
High
ENERGY DRAIN:
Very Significant
ENERGY AVAILABLE:
Critically Directed Zone
COMMUNICATION STYLE:
Teller/Authoritative
LEADERSHIP STYLE:
Authoritative/Decisive
BACKUP LEADERSHIP
STYLE: Dictatorial
Steamroller
DE-MOTIVATING:
- TOO MANY EXTERNAL
CONTROLS,
- INCOMPETENCE OR
- TRIVIAL INTERFERENCES.
MOTIVATING:
- Independence and
Freedom
- Freedom from
Structure
-
Freedom
to
Control
-
Bottom
Line" Results |
REISS PROFILE
: 2001 Reiss
GREEN:
Power, Independence, Curiosity, Eating,
Romance
RED:
Acceptance, Order, Family,
Tranquility
2005
Report
GREEN:
Power, Independence, Eating
RED:
Acceptance, Order, Family,
Status, Tranquility |
MBTI STEP II:
[view
report]
ENTP, Systematic
OOPs |
EMOTIONAL COMPETENCE INVENTORY
[view
report]
Chose EMPATHY [View
Current SFDCS Plan] |
ENNEAGRAM: Eight
[View
Description1][View
Riso Description]
In Security:
Two [View
Description]
In
Stress: Five [View
Description]
9 Types: [View
Description] |
StrengthsFinder: Major Themes
[View
Descriptions]
Ideation,
Strategic,
Achiever,
Activator,
Maximizer |
Change State
Indicator [View] |
Spiral Leadership Map: [View] |
DEVELOPMENTAL REVIEW:
[view]
4(5) Kegan 2000 |
Leadership Developmental
Profile: [view]
Strategist View
Stages
View
Article |
Leadership Style: [view] |
Astrological Data for the Day I was born
here | Great Resource
here |
ASTROLOGICAL CHART:
ARIES
[view
chart]
Reading: Water Dragon
[View
Reading]
Relationship Report
[View
Report] |
Insights Profile [view] |
Inscape [view] |
CRG Leader Personal Style [view] |
LEARNING JOURNAL [DAJ]
[view] |
Revelations
[view] |
2000-1 Dev Plan [view] |
2002 Dev Plan [view] |
2003 Dev Plan [Taking a
break in 2003! I mean 5 years of development in a
row...that's hard on anyone's ego<G>] |
2004 Dev Plan [view] |
2005 Dev Plan [cpr] |
2003 Purpose in Life Questionnaire Score
[view] |
2003 IQ (Matched more
or less my USMC AFQT in 1971) [view] |
2003 Big 5 I'm
a O59-C52-E79-A14-N43 Big Five!! |
2004: Look MOM, a
dandelion....I'm
a dandelion? So says colorgenics! |
2004:
Quiz: What Kind of Manager
Are You?
Your final score: 22 of
30
Results:
You have a balanced view of what is within your control
and what is not. Your responses to circumstances are
fluid and complex, leaning toward internalism in some
situations and externalism in others. You might, for
instance, believe that much of what happens at work is
under the control of others (external), but once you get
home, your life is under your own control (internal)—or
vice versa. (And some areas of life are beyond anyone's
control: a major illness, an economic recession, a
terrorist attack...). As a manager, you're able to adapt
your approach to each individual case. Bear in mind that
externals and internals need to be handled differently
to achieve their best work. |
2004
Archetype: View |
2009
Archetype:
View |
Creator − 29
Sage − 26
Ruler − 26
Warrior − 26
Seeker − 23
Jester − 22
Magician − 21
Lover − 19
Innocent − 17
Destroyer − 16
Caregiver − 12
Orphan − 10 |
Warrior - 30
Creator - 28
Seeker - 27
Ruler - 27
Sage - 26
Magician - 22
Innocent - 21
Destroyer - 21
Lover - 20
Jester - 20
Orphan - 13
Caregiver - 9
|
Read about
archetype |
Jungian Typology
2004
here INTP/ENTP
What is interesting is that both contain the same
functions polarized in the same way, yet the difference
is which one is object and which one is subject as
defined through the attribution of E/I preference. In
some ways, I feel that "introversion" explains a lot of
who I am, however there is no question in my mind that I
am an extravert. One because of how I'm able to deal
with and how I deal with the extraverted world. The
other reason because I know I'm a dominant extraverted
intuitive, placing the thinking function as subordinate
to the intuitive. Yet, when I answered the questions, as
I looked back on my preferences, the one thing that
stands out is the boldness and spontaneity of my natural
action or preference. This clearly prohibits me from
introversion in terms of this set of attributes. Yet, I
feel more drawn to introversion as a way of managing the
tensions of my outer environment. All very interesting
to continue to consider, modeling my dispensation I
would say. |
July 2004: I'm
dying as we speak: Age Calculator Says 71.9
years, less than 20 left into the homestretch! Click
here to see why
I'm not going to live very long. Click
here
to see if you're going to live longer than me. |
August 2004:
Vitamin
Profile Actual
Recommendation |
Measurements |
October 2004:
Values Test;
CSI, Culture Scan |
March 2005: Dr. Phil/Oprah
Profile |
April 2005: Big Five
Profile
|
Your
Results |
|
Closed-Minded |
| Open to New
Experiences |
Disorganized |
| Conscientious |
Introverted |
| Extraverted |
Disagreeable |
| Agreeable |
Calm /
Relaxed |
| Nervous /
High-Strung |
2003: O59-C52-E79-A14-N43
2005: O47-C13-E83-A8-N22 (Note shift in
Conscientiousness--this one is more correct in my mind,
I must have been on drugs in 2003<G>) I'll take
another in 2007, if the test remains online. |
June 2005: Junging Test
Introverted |
Intuitive |
Thinking |
Perceiving |
Strength
of the preferences % |
22 |
75 |
25 |
78 |
INTP type description by D.Keirsey
INTP
type description by J. Butt
Qualitative analysis of your type formula
You are:
- slightly expressed introvert
- distinctively expressed intuitive
personality
- moderately expressed thinking
personality
- very expressed perceiving personality
|
I don't agree that I'm an expressive introvert,
although I know I'm more introvert than most extraverts.
Because I think out loud, I probably have to be classified as
an extravert, with introverted traits...which show up in
the Reiss, as low social contact. |
081805: Socionics:
here
Intuitive-Logical Extratim - ENTp (The Inventor)
Based upon original work by Victor Gulenko with some
alterations
ENTps normally have a
long, slim figure. Other parts of the body are also
stretched, especially the legs and fingers. They often
have rounded shoulders. Sometimes ENTps have a
characteristic inwardly sloping chin. Because of their
particular physical structure their clothes always seem
to fit pretty badly, often slipping down and hanging off
them in an unflattering manner. Their buttons also seem
to have a habit of falling off.
ENTps usually have a distant, far away look in their
eyes and it often seems as though they are paying little
attention to what is going on. During conversation ENTps
like to play with objects, like a pen for example, often
accidentally breaking it. They may gesticulate when
passionately telling a story.
ENTps do not know how to keep the right psychological
distance with people. This becomes especially noticeable
during long term interaction. One day they can be
friendly and the next day they can be completely
opposite. They often behave unceremoniously and can
rudely butt in on others conversations. ENTps can also
find it difficult to evaluate how others feel about them
and therefore can make mistakes when choosing friends.
ENTps like to explore everything and are usually
completely unaware of how others react to this. They
often propose ideas that although have great potential
are completely impractical at the time. As usual, they
soon forget about that idea and generate a new one,
which has no less potential and originality but has no
logical connection with the previous. ENTps pay little
or no respect to their past achievements. They hardly
ever admit when they are at fault. Even if they
apologise formally they usually continue to behave the
same as before.
ENTps are interested in and talk about everything that
is new and unusual even if it is not in their main field
of knowledge. It is as if they are magnetised by all
brand new theories and are fascinated by all phenomena
that can not be explained with logic or reason, for
example: ESP, telekinesis and UFO's. They cannot
logically explain their ideas as they are always
intuitive and vague. Most people cannot fully comprehend
their concepts, they simply believe or do not believe.
The main peculiarity of ENTps behaviour is an incredible
absent-mindedness. They usually leave items where they
used them and have a tendency to constantly lose smaller
objects. ENTps work place and personal belongings are
often kept in disarray. They invariably forget what they
have already done and what they need to do. However,
they are quick and shrewd in day to day matters, taking
advantage of every opportunity that arises. Because of
this others may consider them to be crafty or shifty.
The other main peculiarity of ENTps behaviour is the
ability to mobilise in extreme conditions. If somebody
puts pressure on them they immediately counterattack,
often with more than equal force. They also like to give
people advice on how to extricate themselves from
difficult entanglements, often proposing the most
radical solutions. If ENTps are not interested in a
particular job, they try to leave it until the last
moment. Then in very short period of time they can
complete all awaiting jobs, but of course the quality
suffers.
One more peculiarity is the element of chaos and
destruction that ENTps bring to every field of their
activity. This is especially noticeable in well
established institutions where strong discipline is
commonplace. However, they implement this chaotic
element creatively, generating reform from the
destruction. Because of this quality ENTps often become
leaders.
|
October 2005:
Humor Test | My Results Thumbs down on this thing, it forces you
into things you wouldn't choose, so it's poorly drawn in
my view, but you never know until you try. Some of the
questions I found irrelevant to humor, but then again,
that's me. |
Entrepreneurial Propensity Assessment
here
Last Name |
Overall |
Autonomy |
Achieve |
Innovate |
Recognition |
Risk |
Multi-task |
Financial |
Leadership |
Position |
MBTI |
Average
Population |
4.4 |
4.7 |
4.3 |
3.7 |
4.5 |
3.9 |
4.3 |
4.6 |
|
|
|
MBATech
Entrepreneur |
6.5 |
6.7 |
7 |
5.4 |
6.5 |
6.9 |
6.2 |
6.7 |
|
|
|
Jay |
7.7 |
7.2 |
6.9 |
7.6 |
8.3 |
8.8 |
7.7 |
7.5 |
Strategic |
UL |
ENTP |
|
23 The Royal Star of the
Lion
This is a karmic reward number.
23 bestows, not only a promise of success in
personal and career endeavors, it guarantees help
from superiors and protection from those in high
places. It’s a most fortunate number and greatly
blesses with abundant grace the person represented
by it. As always, the 23 must be considered
alongwith other Single and Compound key Numbers
making up the full numerological analysis, which may
not be quite so fortunate. But other numbers don’t
have much of a chance to bring about serious
trouble when the Royal Star of the Lion is present
during difficult times. No number can challenge the
Lion’s strength to win.
|
Stress Map Online
EQi
August 2006 |
iWAM: Jan 2006 |
October 2006 |
2007: January
www.personalecoach.com
On a regular basis I feel energized.
I am happy for aliveness.
During my day I use my strengths.
I create a fun life.
I give to others everything I have.
I make enough for generati annually.
I use my skills of ideation.
I influence the world I live in by demonstration.
I live sustainably. There I feel energized.
I spend my time together with interested people.
I own sustainable home.
I am significant in the life of modeling. In the
life of modeling my role is to be encouraging.
I am proud of a life fully examined, and fully
lived.
I am grateful for who I am.
|
Select | 2007
Beta Lectic Developmental Survey for Managers |
View
| Vedic Astrology Birth Chart |
View | Values Questionnaire Feedback |
View | SET Engagement Chart |
Strengths Charts |
MindMap | Pyramid |
View
| Numerology Report |
View | StrengthsFinder 2.0 |
View | eStrengths:
One Minute Entrepreneur |
View | Numerology
2012
View | PVQ |
Locus of
Control Assessment
Locus of control refers to how a person
perceives the cause of life events. Someone with an
internal locus of control would generally perceive
himself or herself as responsible for certain
occurrences (his or her actions would have a direct
bearing on the result). On the other hand, a person with
an external locus of control would most often blame (or
thank) fate, destiny, luck, society, or some other force
beyond his or her control.
Your overall locus of control
appears to be in the mid-range between an internal and
external orientation. In general, you probably feel that
while you can very well control and influence many
aspects of your life, there are things that just happen
to you that are outside of your personal control. People
with an external LC tend to feel that they are prisoners
of luck, fate, their genetic make-up, or socioeconomic
status, rather than feeling that they have control over
what happens in their lives. As a consequence, an
external LC might lead to a rather fatalistic and
passive attitude toward life. Perceived lack of control
might lower or inhibit motivation, initiative, and
willingness to take risks. Under such circumstances,
chances of success can be diminished. People with
internal LC, on the other hand, interpret outcomes as
results of their own actions. They tend to take
responsibility as well as credit for the results of
their behavior, and are more proactive in general.
You seem to have struck a balance
between the two ends of the spectrum. It is important to
understand and accept one's own limits, but it is
equally important not to give up without doing one's
best. Even though equilibrium is good in general, try to
shift your locus of control further toward the internal
side, as most research points to this as being the
healthier end of the spectrum.
"I do this, I do that."
The big black snake of selfishness
Has bitten you!
"I do nothing."
This is the nectar of faith,
So drink and be happy!
-Ashtavakra Gita 1:8
ENSIZE: [view report]
|