 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 133133 |
You scored 133 on Emode's IQ test. This means that based
on your answers, your IQ score is between
123 and 133. Most people's IQs are between 70 and 130.
|
In fact, 95% of all people have IQs within that
range. 68% of people score between 80 and 120. The following chart
to your right, shows these percentages and where your IQ
score is on that scale.
Print your
Certificate of Intellectual Achievement.
There's more to intelligence than a single number, a single score or
a single label. Emode uses four distinguishable Intelligence Scales
in the Ultimate IQ Test. By analyzing your individual scores on
those four scales, we are able to look beyond the raw IQ score into
how your process information and thereby determine your Intellectual
Type. |
|
|
 |
|
You are equipped with a verbal arsenal that enables you to
understand complex issues and communicate on a particularly high
level. These talents make you a Word Warrior.
Whether or not you recognize it, your vocabulary is your strongest
suit—use it whenever you can. Since your command of words is so
great, you are also a terrific communicator — able to articulate big
ideas to just about anyone. Your wordsmithing prowess will also help
in artistic and creative pursuits. The power of words translates to
fresh ideas off paper too. Since you have so many words at your
disposal, you are in a unique position to describe things in an
original way, as well as see the future in your mind's eye. |
|
In short, your strengths allow you to be a visionary — able to
extrapolate and come up with a multitude of fresh ideas. And you are
in good company — bask in the brilliance of Word Warriors who have
walked before you. William Shakespeare let loose the power of his
pen. His ability to articulate the most subtle nuances of human
nature and to create colorful characters are why his stories still
have a major impact — even 400 years after he first wrote them.
Whether you put pen to paper or use your understanding of the words
around you to come up with creative approaches to problems, your
potential as a Word Warrior is terrific. |
|
Because of the way you process
information, these are just some of the many careers in which
you wcould excel:
- Writer
- Translator
- Publisher
- Attorney
- Poet
- Politician
- Journalist
- Lecturer
|
You've got tons of strengths.
It wouldn't surprise us if you:
- Can clarify complex issues
- Can articulate commonly understood
truths
- Can foster understanding
- Can creatively solve problems
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now let's look at the factors that contribute to you being a Word
Warrior with a 133 IQ score.
Based on the results of your test, Emode divided your scores into four
distinguishable dimensions — mathematical intelligence, visual-spatial
intelligence, linguistic intelligence and logic intelligence.
Here's how each of your intelligence scores break down:
Your Mathematical Percentile
You scored in the 90th percentile on the mathematical intelligence
scale.This means that you scored higher than 80% - 90% of people who
took the test and that 10% - 20% scored higher than you did. The scale
above illustrates this visually.
Your mathematical intelligence score represents your combined ability to
reason and calculate. You scored relatively high, which means you're
probably the one your friends look to when splitting the lunch bill or
calculating your waitresses' tip. You may or may not be known as a math
whiz, but number crunching might come a little easier to you than it
does others.
This is the kind of question that helped to determine your mathematical
intelligence score:
A boy is 4 years old and his sister is three times as old as he is. When
the boy is 12 years old, how old will his sister be? 16, 20, 24, 28, 32.
answer: 20.
The sister is (3 )three times older than her (4) four-year-old brother.
Three times 4 is 12, in other words, when he is four, she is 12. Twelve
years old is 8 years older than 4 years old, which makes her 8 years
older than him. This never changes. Therefore, when he is 12, she is
still 8 years older, or 12+8=20.
Like anything, keeping or
improving your math talents requires practice. Here are some
everyday mental exercises that could particularly helpful to you:
- Balancing your checkbook
- Figuring out your monthly budget
- Predicting what the change will be the next
time you buy something
- Calculating your waitperson's tip in your
head
|
Your Visual-Spatial Percentile
You scored in the 50th percentile on the visual-spatial intelligence
scale.
This means that you scored higher than 40% - 50% of people who took the
test and that 50% - 60% scored higher than you did. The scale above
illustrates this visually.
The visual-spatial component of intelligence measures your ability to
extract a visual pattern and from that envision what should come next in
a sequence. Your score was relatively low,
meaning you might leave the map reading, chess playing and metaphor
forming to your friends. These are all skills that come a little easier
to people who tend to think in pictures.
Here's the type of question that contributed to your visual-spatial
intelligence score:
The answer lies in recognizing not only the visual sequence of a
square and then a line, but in the recognizing the solidity of the line
in the first example and the broken quality of the line in the second
example.
Like anything, keeping or
improving visual-spatial talents requires some practice. Here are
some everyday mental exercises that will be particularly helpful to
you:
- Playing chess, or video games like Tetris
- Studying maps and become the navigator on
your next trip
- Sculpting or photography
|
Your Linguistic Percentile
You scored in the 100th percentile on the linguistic intelligence scale.
This means that you scored higher than 90% - 100% of people who took the
test and that 0% - 10% scored higher than you did. The scale above
illustrates this visually.
Linguistic abilities include reading, writing and communicating with
words. Emode's test measures knowledge of vocabulary, ease in completing
word analogies and the ability to think critically about a statement
based on its semantic structure. Your score was relatively high, which
could mean you know your way around a bookstore and maybe like to bandy
about the occasional 25-cent word to impress friends.
Here's the type of question that contributed to your linguistic
intelligence scale score:
Inept is the opposite of:
Answer: Skillful.
The answer is derived by prior knowledge that "inept" means "unskillful"
(Oxford Concise Dictionary).
Like anything, keeping or
improving linguistic talents requires some practice. Here are some
everyday mental exercises that will be particularly helpful to you:
- Doing crossword puzzles
- Start reading just for fun
- Befriending your dictionary
- The next time something breaks, try reading
the instruction book first
|
Your Logical Percentile
You scored in the 100th percentile on the logical intelligence scale.
This means that you scored higher than 90% - 100% of people who took the
test and that 0% - 10% scored higher than you did. The scale above
illustrates this visually.
Emode's logical intelligence questions assess your ability to think
things through. The questions determine the extent to which you use
reasoning and logic to determine the best solution to a problem. Your
logic score was relatively high, which could mean that when the car
breaks down, your friends look to you to help figure out not only what's
wrong, but how to fix it and how you're going to get to the next gas
station.
Here's the kind of question that contributed to your logical
intelligence score:
If some Wicks are Slicks and some Slicks are Snicks, then some Wicks are
definitely Snicks.
Answer: False
The statement is false because while some Wicks might be Slicks, there
is no conclusive proof that any of them might be Snicks.
Like anything, keeping or
improving logical talents requires some practice. Here are some
everyday mental exercises that will be particularly helpful to you:
- Trying some brain teasers
- Throwing away the instructions and relying
on instinct to fix something
- Playing chess
|
For each scale, Emode
determined how many people received scores above and below yours.
Your "percentile" represents what percentage of people scored lower
than you. In other words, 90th percentile means you scored higher
than 80 to 90% of people did.
How are the percentiles determined? These percentiles were
determined based on the one million users who have already taken our
test. We then adjusted these percentiles based on a nationally
representative IQ distribution to make sure that no level of
intelligence was over- or underrepresented in the analysis. Thus,
the percentiles we present reflect your score compared with people
in the United States in general. |
If your score isn't as high as you thought it would be, remember that
there are plenty of external factors that can affect your performance on
the test. If you were tired, hungry or distracted, you might have scored
lower than you expected because you were less able to concentrate.
Your level of formal education and your familiarity with taking these
kinds of tests also influence how well you do. That's part of the reason
IQ tests aren't a perfect measure of your intelligence. Your score would
probably be quite different if the IQ test was designed to take into
account your musical, artistic, emotional and social skills.
On their own, IQ scores can't predict someone's ultimate success or
definitive potential for success. Many of the qualities that lead to
great achievements are learned through culture, experience and schooling
- not solely from doing well on an IQ test.
What your IQ test can help explain, however, is how your brain works
best. By looking at the kinds of questions you answered correctly and
the kinds of questions you answered incorrectly, we can tell you more
about your intelligence type — the type that explains the kind of
information that makes sense to your brain. |
|
|
|
Now that you know your IQ score, your Intelligence Type and your rank
along the four intelligence scales (Mathematical, Visual-Spatial,
Linguistic and Logical), we thought you might want to go back and see
how you answered various questions. People often waver on at least a
couple of questions, so we've provided the full set of questions along
with the answer key.
= your answer
= correct answer
| 1. |
Which one of the five choices makes the
best comparison? LIVED is to DEVIL as 6323 is to: |
| |
|
2336 |
| |
|
6232 |
| |
|
3236
|
| |
|
3326 |
| |
|
6332 |
| |
| 2. |
Which one of these five is least like
the other four? |
| |
|
Mule |
| |
|
Kangaroo
|
| |
|
Cow |
| |
|
Deer |
| |
|
Donkey |
| |
| 3. |
Which number should come next? 144 121
100 81 64 ? |
| |
|
17 |
| |
|
19 |
| |
|
36 |
| |
|
49
|
| |
|
50 |
| |
| 4. |
Even the most ___________ rose has
thorns. |
| |
|
Ugly |
| |
|
Weathered |
| |
|
Lonely |
| |
|
Noxious |
| |
|
Tempting
|
| |
| 5. |
HAND is to Glove as HEAD is to |
| |
|
Hair |
| |
|
Hat
|
| |
|
Neck |
| |
|
Earring |
| |
|
Hairpin |
| |
| 7. |
John likes 400 but not 300; he likes
100 but not 99; he likes 2500 but not 2400. Which does he like: |
| |
|
900
|
| |
|
1000 |
| |
|
1100 |
| |
|
1200 |
| |
| 8. |
A fallacious argument is: |
| |
|
Disturbing |
| |
|
Valid |
| |
|
False
|
| |
|
Necessary |
| |
| 9. |
If you rearrange the letters "ANLDEGN,"
you would have the name of a(n): |
| |
|
Ocean |
| |
|
Country
|
| |
|
State |
| |
|
City |
| |
|
Animal |
| |
| 10. |
NASA received three messages in a
strange language from a distant planet. The scientists studied the
messages and found that "Necor Buldon Slock" means "Danger Rocket
Explosion" and "Edwan Mynor Necor" means "Danger Spaceship Fire" and
"Buldon Gimilzor Gondor" means "Bad Gas Explosion". What does
"Slock" mean? |
| |
|
Danger |
| |
|
Explosion |
| |
|
Nothing |
| |
|
Rocket
|
| |
|
Gas |
| |
| 11. |
If some Wicks are Slicks, and some
Slicks are Snicks, then some Wicks are definitely Snicks. The
statement is: |
| |
|
True |
| |
|
False
|
| |
|
Neither |
| |
| 12. |
Ann is taller than Jill, and Kelly is
shorter than Ann. Which of the following statements would be most
accurate? |
| |
|
Kelly is taller than Jill |
| |
|
Kelly is shorter than Jill |
| |
|
Kelly is as tall as Jill |
| |
|
It's impossible to tell
|
| |
| 13. |
A boy is 4 years old and his sister is
three times as old as he is. When the boy is 12 years old, how old
will his sister be? |
| |
|
16 |
| |
|
20
|
| |
|
24 |
| |
|
28 |
| |
|
32 |
| |
| 14. |
Assume that these two statements are
true: All brown-haired men have bad tempers. Larry is a brown-haired
man. The statement Larry has a bad temper is: |
| |
|
True
|
| |
|
False |
| |
|
Unable to determine |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 15. |
Two girls caught 25 frogs. Lisa caught
four times as many as Jen did. How many frogs did Jen catch? |
| |
|
4 |
| |
|
5
|
| |
|
8 |
| |
|
10 |
| |
|
15 |
| |
| 16. |
Inept is the opposite of: |
| |
|
Fit |
| |
|
Deep |
| |
|
Skillful
|
| |
|
Sad |
| |
|
Happy |
| |
| 17. |
A car traveled 28 miles in 30 minutes.
How many miles per hour was it traveling? |
| |
|
28 |
| |
|
36 |
| |
|
56
|
| |
|
58 |
| |
|
62 |
| |
| 18. |
If all Zips are Zoodles, and all
Zoodles are Zonkers, then all Zips are definitely Zonkers.
The above sentence is logically: |
| |
|
True
|
| |
|
False |
| |
|
Neither |
| |
| 19. |
Sue is both the 50th best and the 50th
worst student at her school. How many students attend her school? |
| |
|
50 |
| |
|
75 |
| |
|
99
|
| |
|
100 |
| |
|
101 |
| |
| 20. |
In a race from point X to point Y and
back, Jack averages 30 miles per hour to point Y and 10 miles per
hour back to point X. Sandy averages 20 miles per hour in both
directions. Between Jack and Sandy, who finished first? |
| |
|
Jack |
| |
|
Sandy
|
| |
|
They tie |
| |
|
Neither |
| |
|
Impossible to tell |
| |
| 21. |
Ten people can paint 60 houses in 120
days, so five people can paint 30 houses in: |
| |
|
15 days |
| |
|
30 days |
| |
|
60 days |
| |
|
120 days
|
| |
| 22. |
The pure and simple truth is rarely
pure and never ________. |
| |
|
Complete |
| |
|
Accurate |
| |
|
Complex |
| |
|
Simple
|
| |
|
Wise |
| |
| 23. |
Which number should come next? 64, 16,
4, 1, 1/4? |
| |
|
1/16
|
| |
|
1/12 |
| |
|
1/8 |
| |
|
1/2 |
| |
|
1 |
| |
| 24. |
What number is one half of one quarter
of one tenth of 800? |
| |
|
2 |
| |
|
5 |
| |
|
8 |
| |
|
10
|
| |
|
40 |
| |
| 25. |
A cynic is one who knows the price of
everything and the ________ of nothing. |
| |
|
Emotion |
| |
|
Value
|
| |
|
Meaning |
| |
|
Color |
| |
|
Quality |
| |
| 26. |
Two cars start off at the same point on
a straight highway facing opposite directions. Each car drives for 6
miles, takes a left turn, and drives for 8 miles. How far apart are
the two cars? |
| |
|
2 miles |
| |
|
11 miles |
| |
|
14 miles |
| |
|
20 miles
|
| |
|
26 miles |
| |
| 27. |
Which one of these five things is least
like the other four? |
| |
|
Coconut |
| |
|
Grape
|
| |
|
Banana |
| |
|
Apple |
| |
|
Pear |
| |
| 28. |
Wisdom is knowing what to do next;
__________ is doing it. |
| |
|
Virtue
|
| |
|
Luck |
| |
|
Happiness |
| |
|
Sanity |
| |
|
Nostalgia |
| |
| 29. |
It is easier to _______________ than to
offer a helping hand. |
| |
|
Raise a flag |
| |
|
Shout an insult |
| |
|
Lay down |
| |
|
Point the finger
|
| |
|
Sing praises |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 30. |
True knowledge exists in knowing that
you know ___________. |
| |
|
Everything |
| |
|
Nothing
|
| |
|
The truth |
| |
|
The weather |
| |
|
The meaning of life |
| |
| 31. |
Which word best completes the analogy:
Water is to glass as letter is to... |
| |
|
mail |
| |
|
stamp |
| |
|
pen |
| |
|
envelope
|
| |
|
book |
| |
| 33. |
Which one of the designs is least like
the other four?
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| 34. |
For the picture sequence above, find the picture that follows
logically from one of the six below.
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| 35. |
For the picture sequence above, find the picture that follows
logically from one of the five below.
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| 36. |
Fill in the empty box above with the correct picture from below |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
|
| |
|
 |
| |
|
 |
| |
| 37. |
Fill in the white box above with the correct picture from below |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
|
| |
| 40. |
Which design does not belong in this
group? |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
|
| |
|
 |
| |
|
 |
| |
= your answer
= correct answer |
|
|
|
The intelligence quotient (IQ) measures the ratio of a person's
intellectual age to his/her chronological age. Most adult intelligence
tests are designed for people who are at least 16 years old. For this
reason, if you are younger than 16, your Emode IQ score might be
slightly lower than your "true" IQ.
One of the first scientific investigations into the concept of
intelligence, came from nineteenth-century British scientist, Sir
Francis Galton. Galton believed that mental traits, like physical
traits, could be inherited. He published his ideas on hereditary
intelligence in his book, Hereditary Genius.
Meanwhile in France, psychologist Alfred Binet was exploring ways of
measuring children's' intelligence. Like Galton, Binet was passionate
about testing and measuring human capabilities. Binet worked with two
groups of children - those who were average students, and those who were
less mentally capable. He discovered that average students could
complete certain tasks that less mentally capable students could not.
Based on those findings, Binet calculated the "normal" abilities for
students within different age groups. From there he could estimate how
many years above or below the norm a student's mental age was.
Just before WWI, German psychologist Wilhelm Stern came up with an
alternative to mental age for measuring people's intelligence. He
suggested that a more accurate method for assessing someone's
intelligence was to measure their capabilities given their chronological
age. He proposed that for a true estimate of someone's intelligence,
researchers needed to calculate a ratio between the subject's mental age
and their chronological age. Since the resulting numbers were
represented by decimals, scientists decided to multiply this "quotient"
by 100 to get rid of the decimal places. Thus, the formula for an IQ is:
IQ = Mental Age/Chronological Age x 100.
Based on the ratio that Stern created, Lewis Terman, an American
psychologist at Stanford University, coined the term Intelligence
Quotient for Stern's Binet test scoring system.
IQ tests serve as a useful tool for institutions such as public schools
and the military, where great numbers of people must be processed
quickly and efficiently, and placed in appropriated classes or
positions.
In the United States, kindergarten-aged children are often given IQ
tests to evaluate whether they need special attention or services. For
example, children scoring 130 or over are often considered "gifted" and
placed in programs accordingly. However, in most institutional uses of
the test nowadays, the importance placed on the actual IQ score has
changed.
A
widely-cited example of possible cultural bias appeared in the
Scholastic Aptitude Test in the early 90s:
Runner: marathon
A) Envoy: embassy
B) Martyr: massacre
C) Oarsman: regatta
D) Referee: tournament
E) Horse: stable.
(Herrnstein and Murray, 1994) According to many, the answer, C), is
more likely to be answered correctly by upper class children
(predominantly white) because they are more inclined to know the
definition of regatta.
|
The military tends to use IQ test results to assess which field a
recruit might be best suited to. Instead of relying solely on the
intelligence rating, the IQ score, the military will now look at the
kinds of questions a recruit answered correctly. Once they know that,
they have a better idea of what innate skills the recruit can bring to
specific assignments and duties.
And as far as the business world goes, uses of such tests for employment
purposes was declared illegal — except in rare circumstances — by the
Supreme Court in 1971.
In social life, the IQ test is only really applicable if you're
specifically joining an organization based on IQ scores like Mensa, a
society founded in 1964 for people who score in the top 2% of the IQ
test. But, in general, there are still some misconceptions about the
importance of test results. Chances are, people you know are more likely
to be judgmental about a high or low score than most institutions are.
Luckily, this is usually just a case of misinformation and is easily
remedied.
| Robert Jordan, an applicant
to the New Haven, CT police force sued the department in 1997 after
he was refused entry on grounds that his IQ test score was "too
high." A spokesperson for the police department was quoted as saying
people with too high of an IQ "tire of police work and leave not
long after undergoing costly academy training."
|
Much debate circulates around the different IQ tests that are
administered throughout the country. Many researchers claim that the
tests measure cultural knowledge and understanding, not innate
intelligence. Critics suggest that both IQ and standardized tests are
racially and culturally biased.
According to a 1996 report by the American Psychological Association,
"Intelligence scores partially predict individual differences in school
achievement, such as grade point average and number of years of
education that individuals complete.
Nevertheless, population levels of school achievement are not determined
solely or even primarily by intelligence or any other
individual-difference variable. Many differences can be attributed
primarily to differences in culture and schooling rather than in
abilities measured by intelligence tests."
Outside factors, such as where you grow up, what kind of school you
attend, and how much school you attend contribute substantially to the
development of intelligences. However, it is not yet clearly understood
what those factors are, or how they work. It is widely agreed that
standardized tests, like an IQ test, do not accurately reflect all forms
of intelligence.
Obviously, cultural knowledge, creativity, wisdom, common sense and
social sensitivity are not measured in IQ tests, but they certainly
contribute to a person's intelligence.
Still, there are some people who feel strongly that IQ tests are the
best way to predict future performance at work and in school. They feel
that IQ tests are better predictors of future success than even trained
personnel experts.
Experts have numerous theories when it comes to explaining, defining and
predicting intelligence. Some claim that intelligence is innate and
fixed and can be measured with clearly defined statistical methods.
Others claim that experience and environment affect intelligence - that
intelligence is the composite of many different talents and abilities
which continue to improve over time.
Three researchers have made significant advances in this field in recent
years:
1. Robert Sternberg - Has proposed three sub-theories of
intelligence: context, experience, and the cognitive components of
information processing. In short, intelligence involves either adapting
to your environment, moving to another more appropriate environment or
changing your environment. Your level of experience with the activities
or knowledge being tested gets reduced to intelligence, but intelligence
is best measured out of context — when you perform unfamiliar tasks.
2. Howard Gardner - Has proposed his "Theory of Multiple
Intelligences" where there are seven independent but related
intelligences: logical-mathematical, linguistic, musical, spatial,
bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal and intrapersonal. Gardner is one of
the biggest proponents for developing new methods for testing
intelligence. He speculates that intelligence is culturally and
experientially based. One's experience will influence how much each of
these can be expressed.
3. John Horn - Horn had proposed that there are two factors to
intelligence: fluid intelligence and crystallized intelligence. Fluid
intelligence is one's ability to reason and solve problems in novel or
unfamiliar situations. Crystallized intelligence is the extent to which
an individual has attained knowledge of her culture.
In general, recent research has focused on intelligence as something
that can be changed — not as something that is fixed in childhood and as
something culturally and experientially based. Most current researchers
agree that there are multiple forms of intelligence, although there is
no consensus on how many. |
|
|
|
Over the last two years, Emode's psychologists developed this IQ test
using proven, high-quality IQ test questions such as those in the Mensa
Workout tests and the Shipley Institute of Living Scale — an
intelligence test that focuses on both vocabulary and verbal abstract
reasoning. Those are the skills that are associated with problem-solving
ability and social comprehension/judgement.
Once we built the Emode IQ test, Emode performed a large-scale study to
compare the results of people who had taken both the Emode IQ test and
the established Shipley Institute of Living Scale (by Walter C.
Shipley). The Shipley test has been used for more than 50 years to
assess facets of intelligence. We did this to ensure that the way we
constructed our test would yield reliable and valid IQ results.
We used scores calculated by the Shipley test as a basis for calibrating
Emode's IQ test. That ensured a high association between the two tests
and, because of that, the validity of our IQ scores. In fact, the Emode
IQ test is highly reliable—the Chronbach's alpha is .81. In other words,
the questions on Emode's IQ test are internally consistent and they all
measure intelligence accurately.
In the past, researchers who have constructed IQ tests have discovered
additional patterns that relate to the categories of questions a
particular test-taker answered correctly — categories such as
mathematical, visual, verbal and logical. When these researchers
analyzed peoples' results, they found that, for instance, a test-taker
might have answered the math-oriented and verbal questions correctly,
yet tended to answer the logical questions incorrectly. From such
patterns, experts were able to define some internal scales of
intelligence to the overall IQ test. Thus, using those internal scales,
they could offer an actual IQ score, such as 105, as well as a
measurement of how well the test-taker did within each question
category.
After 1 million people took the Emode IQ test, we ran what is called a
"factor analysis" on the answers those people gave. This statistical
analysis identified the similarity between groups of questions in our
test. The analysis demonstrated that this particular IQ test accurately
measured four underlying dimensions of intelligence: mathematical,
visual-spatial, linguistic and logical.
Each of the questions in the Emode IQ test relates to one dimension of
intelligence. How reliable are these dimensions? Well, for the
scientists and statisticians out there, their reliability coefficients
were .85, .84, .81 and .50, respectively. The gist of all of that is
that Emode's scales of intelligence are highly valid and we can
accurately tell you how high you scored on each of those scales relative
to the other test-takers—thus yielding an accurate intellectual type.
|
|
|
|
Armstrong, T. (1993). 7 Kinds of Smart: Identifying and Developing Your
Many Intelligences. NY: Plume (The Penguin Group).
Bonthous, J. (1995). "Understanding intelligence across cultures."
Competitive Intelligence Review, Summer/Fall: 12-19.
Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences
(10th Anniversary Edition). NY: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1992). Multiple Intelligences: The Theory in Practice. NY:
Basic Books.
Gardner, H.. (1985). The Mind's New Science. NY: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. and Hatch, T. (1989). "Multiple Intelligences Go to School:
Educational Implications of the Theory of Multiple Intelligences."
Educational Researcher 18(8): 4-9.
Gardner, H., Kornhaber, M.L., and Wake, W.K. (1996). Intelligence:
Multiple Perspectives. NY: Harcourt, Brace.
Horn, J.L. (1989). "Cognitive diversity: A framework for learning." Pp.
61-116 in P.L.
Ackerman, R.J. Sternberg, and R. Glaser (Eds.), Learning and Individual
differences: Advances in theory and research. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman
and Co.
Jensen, A. R. (1969). "How much can we boost I.Q. and scholastic
achievement?" Harvard Educational Review 39:1-123.
Lohman, D.F. (1989). "Human intelligence: An introduction to advances in
theory and research." Review of Educational Research 59(4):333-374.
Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Jr., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N.,
Ceci, S. J., Halpern, D. F., Loehlin, J. C., Perloff, R., Sternberg, R.
J., & Urbina, S. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American
Psychologist, 51, 77-101.
Ree, M. J., & Earles, J. A. (1992). "Intelligence is the best predictor
of job performance." Current Directions in Psychological Science
1:86-89.
Robbins, D. (1996). The Philosophy of Intelligence: An Outline of
Theories. Psychology Department, University of Calgary.
Sternberg, R. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (1998). "Human abilities." Annual
Review of Psychology 49:479-502.
Sternberg, R. J., Wagner, R. K., Williams, W. M., & Horvath, J. A.
(1995). "Testing common sense." American Psychologist 50:912-927.
Sternberg, R.J. (1991). "Death, taxes, and bad intelligence tests."
Intelligence 15(3):257-269.
Sternberg, R.J. (1992). "Ability tests, measurements, and markets."
Journal of Educational Psychology 84(2):134-140.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
